Showing posts with label branding. Show all posts
Showing posts with label branding. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 1, 2009

How to Miss Out on Advertising Opportunities

The MTA, New York’s transportation authority, is facing another shortfall in its budget. For the second time in a year fares will be raised.

I find it hard to believe that the largest subway system in the world with some of the best real estate (yes, I know most of it is subterranean) has not taken the path many other transport systems in the world have taken – Advertise like there’s no tomorrow!

Yes, the subway cars and the stations do have advertising in the form of easily-vandalized posters and poorly-lit and maintained ad displays. However, is this all we can manage in a city saturated with the biggest, best, most famous and fabulous symbols of the 20th Century?

While living in Japan (for 3 long years) I became accustomed to everything imaginable being plastered with advertising, most noticeably the subway/train networks. At first it seemed a bit invasive holding onto strap handles with autumn leaves tickling my hand (campaign for a popular bottled tea brand) and ads on digital panels flickering to catch my attention.


But when I moved to New York I quickly learned these so-called saturation methods of advertising benefited everyone. The straphangers, subway company, local government, advertising firm, and of course the company/brand being advertised all got their own kind of win fall. Was it really a sacrifice to have this kind of advertising in my face when I had a stable fare, clean seats and not to mention some innovative advertising to look at? Simply put, no.


All photos are courtesy of Adzilla.blogspot.com

Tuesday, December 9, 2008

A 'Whopper' of a Mistake?

Burger King has gone all out on a path that was recently taken by Dunkin’. This time however Burger King has decided to take its taste test (Whopper vs. Big Mac) to the “Whopper Virgins” of the world: Transylvanian farmers, Thai Hmong tribesman and Greenland Inuit. What an idea!!!

Various world food groups and human rights groups have denounced the ads , created by Crispin Porter + Bogusky, calling them ignorant and offensive, amongst other things. The word "colonialism" and "orientalism" have also popped up a few times.

Some industry people believe the ad campaign is merely to create controversy. Clearly, BK underestimated the level of negative reaction that would be generated. Like Dunkin’ BK already has a strong brand. A controversy about its ads exploiting ethnic groups could never be thought as being in line with its brand strategy.

I am thinking more about Whoppers today than I normally do but I’m also thinking of Burger King in a completely different light – one that is neither positive nor appetizing.

In a world of ever-growing political correctness is it safe for powerful brands to go out and push the boundaries or is this solely for the ‘new brands on the block’ that have less to lose? Will you always be upsetting somebody no matter how you advertise, or are there just certain boundaries that you don’t cross?


Thursday, December 4, 2008

It's Great Coffee (statistically speaking)

How many times do companies need to tell us what tastes good, or in this case, 16% better?

TV, radio, print and the Internet have been bombarded recently by the "Dunkin' tastes better than Starbucks" ads. But the fact that Dunkin' took this oft-traveled road has surprised me. People inherently are connected to a brand through emotion, not statistics. This has been proven with many a failed brand-building attempt especially in the cosmetic and household cleaning markets.

So what is different this time? First of all Dunkin' is a very strong brand. A new entrant into the "Morning Cup of Joe" market advertising this way would get little positive results. Secondly, Dunkin' has gone all out. Their website Dunkinbeatstarbucks supports the other media well with anti-Starbucks propaganda and the ability to send an ecard to your friends convincing them to stop drinking Starbucks(I hope my friends have less time on their hands).

So perhaps the campaign isn't as clear cut as showing statistics and trashing the other brand. Dunkin' have intelligently created an emotional connection by 'rallying up the fans' and declaring war on overpriced coffee(a few cents more than Dunkin') , comfortable seats and ambient lighting. With the way the economy is going more people may be turning to the cheaper, less flashy alternative for their morning cup of coffee.